Today during our two presentations on Classics, I wrote down some snippets of comments, conversations, and remarks that the students made about one of the books being presented - Winnie the Pooh (which AQ had read.) Their comments illustrate the unusual way many of my kiddos think about and process information.
AQ was asked why he thought so many people missed out on the wonderful books about Pooh. He was very blunt in his response.
"I blame Disney," he stated firmly. Then he elaborated about how, while the movies and cartoons about Winnie the Pooh are well done and often close to the books, they are targeted toward a preschool crowd. And, as a result, people dismiss the books as only for young children.
"I think these are books you should read as a child and as an older person. Little children won't get the humor but they'll enjoy the stories. Adults will enjoy the humor. I really hold a grudge against Disney for what they've done to the books."
(AQ was quite serious about his assessment of Disney's culpability. He is one of my many students who have become quite possessive and opinionated about the literature they have read!)
EP then asked about the book Now We Are Six, a poetry book involving A. A. Milne's characters. But, she had a completely different perspective on the book from its title.
"Who are the six characters the book talks about?" she queried AQ.
He paused for a minute (as did I at my desk) thinking about what she meant. I think both AQ and I figured it out at the same time.
"It's about turning six years old," he explained, "not about six of the characters."
For me, that was an example of the unusual ways of thinking my students have - sometimes they look at something very common to me and turn it upside down. The result? Better clarity for all.
The book AQ is currently reading is The Invisible Man by H. G. Wells. In preparing his presentation on Winnie the Pooh, he'd discovered that H. G. Wells had been A. A. Milne's teacher. He made some wonderful connections about the two men and wondered aloud about the fact that they both used only their initials in their professional names, that their literature was quite dissimilar, and yet commonalities could still be found. Pretty impressive for an eleven year old!
Finally, and I had to stifle my smile and laughter, AQ mentioned a section he had removed from his paper. "I wrote another section, but I took it out. It made my paper eighteen pages long, and you know, I'm just not that kind of person. I'm not one who is writing for length. So, I removed it and my paper is only fourteen pages long."
Only fourteen pages long? Bear in mind that those are TYPEWRITTEN pages and he's only a fifth grader. There are college students who would be hard pressed to write that much about a book!
Have I ever mentioned how much I love my job?
Dogs of Our Lives: Pepper & Her Frisbee
7 hours ago


















































