Recorded in this blog has been my frustration with (now former, thankfully) Tony Bennett, Indiana State Superintendent of Schools and (also now former) Governor Mitch Daniels and the havoc they wreaked on education in Indiana. I know of good teachers who retired from or left the teaching profession as a result of sweeping"reforms" the two made while in office.
Personally, I have been affected, with countless hours being added to my workload as I had to plan, write, implement, document, and finish "goals" that showed I was doing what I was supposed to do.
With Bennett not trusting teachers to be honest (and in all fairness, I would assume that not all are) I could no longer manage my ISTEP testing; instead, the building principals had to, and my tests were kept under lock and key, with me being allowed to see them only as I checked them out (counting each copy and then signing my name to account for the tests), had the students take them, and then returning them immediately (again, after counting them and then signing my name) to ensure I had no opportunities to cheat or change scores.
Seeing the state make an error on Hershey's score a few years ago, assigning us a C instead of the A we'd earned, and a formal protest and request for inquiry made by Dr. Scott Hanback, TSC's superintendent, only to have the state acknowledge their error but be told that, since the grade was already posted on their web site, it was too late to change it.
I thought of all these incidents when the story broke last week that Tony Bennett had himself cheated and manipulated scores for political gain. (Note that teachers and administrators caught doing the same in other states have lost their jobs and been prosecuted.)
To say I am angry would be an understatement. The result of the fallout was that Bennett resigned from his lucrative position of Superintendent of Florida schools (lucky Florida!) but the long term effects? Still ongoing in Indiana, and will for years, I would guess.
In the meantime, I am singing
Ding, Dong, the Witch is Dead and am hoping that he is prosecuted for his crimes to the fullest extent of the law.
Here is the original article from the Associated Press.
Chief Tony Bennett built his national star by promising to hold “failing” schools accountable. But when it appeared an Indianapolis charter school run by a prominent Republican donor might receive a poor grade, Bennett’s education team frantically overhauled his signature “A-F” school grading system to improve the school’s marks.
Emails obtained by The Associated Press show Bennett and his staff scrambled last fall to ensure influential donor Christel DeHaan’s school received an “A,” despite poor test scores in algebra that initially earned it a “C.”
“They need to understand that anything less than an A for Christel House compromises all of our accountability work,” Bennett wrote in a Sept. 12 email to then-chief of staff Heather Neal, who is now Gov. Mike Pence’s chief lobbyist.
The emails, which also show Bennett discussing with staff the legality of changing just DeHaan’s grade, raise unsettling questions about the validity of a grading system that has broad implications. Indiana uses the A-F grades to determine which schools get taken over by the state and whether students seeking state-funded vouchers to attend private school need to first spend a year in public school. They also help determine how much state funding schools receive.
A low grade also can detract from a neighborhood and drive homebuyers elsewhere.
Bennett, who now is reworking Florida’s grading system as that state’s education commissioner, reviewed the emails Monday morning and denied that DeHaan’s school received special treatment. He said discovering that the charter would receive a low grade raised broader concerns with grades for other “combined” schools — those that included multiple grade levels — across the state.
“There was not a secret about this,” he said. “This wasn’t just to give Christel House an A. It was to make sure the system was right to make sure the system was face valid.”
However, the emails clearly show Bennett’s staff was intensely focused on Christel House, whose founder has given more than $2.8 million to Republicans since 1998, including $130,000 to Bennett and thousands more to state legislative leaders.
Other schools saw their grades change, but the emails show DeHaan’s charter was a catalyst for the changes.
Though Indiana had had a school ranking system since 1999, Bennett switched to the A-F system and made it a signature item of his education agenda, raising the stakes for schools statewide.
Bennett consistently cited Christel House as a top-performing school as he secured support for the measure from business groups and lawmakers, including House Speaker Brian Bosma and Senate President Pro Tem David Long.
In early 2012, Bennett proposed a sweeping overhaul of the way schools earned A to F grades, including adding new measures for student test score growth and college and career readiness. The new rules were universally opposed by a wide spectrum of education interest groups on the left and right, from urban schools to charter schools to the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, at a January 2012 hearing of the Indiana State Board of Education. Critics complained that the new rules were difficult to understand and potentially unfair to some schools.
In February of that year, Bennett’s office put out a simulation, showing what grades schools might have earned if the new system were in place but based on only part of the data that would be included in the new system. The number of A’s crashed by more than 20 percentage points to 24 percent statewide, and F’s doubled to 10 percent, resulting in calls to reconsider the new system.
Among those complaining were charters schools — not one charter in the state recieved an A in the simulation. Advocates asked how traditionally high performing charters like Christel House, Herron High School and the Tindley Acclerated School had not received higher grades.
At the time, Bennett insisted that the new system was a work in progress and revisions were underway. But his office seemed focused heavily on Christel House over other charters and traditional public schools, according to the emails.
Trouble loomed when Indiana’s then-grading director, Jon Gubera, first alerted Bennett on Sept. 12 that the Christel House Academy had scored less than an A in the latest revision.
“This will be a HUGE problem for us,” Bennett wrote in a Sept. 12, 2012 email to Neal.
Neal fired back a few minutes later, “Oh, crap. We cannot release until this is resolved.”
By Sept. 13, Gubera unveiled it was a 2.9, or a “C.”
A weeklong behind-the-scenes scramble ensued among Bennett, assistant superintendent Dale Chu, Gubera, Neal and other top staff at the Indiana Department of Education. They examined ways to lift Christel House from a “C’’ to an “A,” including adjusting the presentation of color charts to make a high “B’’ look like an “A’’ and changing the grade just for Christel House.
It’s not clear from the emails exactly how Gubera changed the grading formula, but they do show DeHaan’s grade jumping twice.
“That’s like parting the Red Sea to get numbers to move that significantly,” Jeff Butts, superintendent of Wayne Township schools in Indianapolis, said in an interview with The Associated Press.
DeHaan, who opened the Christel House Academy charter school in Indianapolis in 2002 also operates schools in India, Mexico and South Africa, said in a statement Monday that no one from the school ever made any requests that would affect Christel House’s grades.
Bennett said Monday he felt no special pressure to deliver an “A’’ for DeHaan. Instead, he argued, if he had paid more attention to politics he would have won re-election in Indiana.
Yet Bennett wrote to staff twice in four days, directly inquiring about DeHaan’s status. Gubera broke the news after the second note that “terrible” 10th grade algebra results had “dragged down their entire school.”
Bennett called the situation “very frustrating and disappointing” in an email that day.
“I am more than a little miffed about this,” Bennett wrote. “I hope we come to the meeting today with solutions and not excuses and/or explanations for me to wiggle myself out of the repeated lies I have told over the past six months.”
Bennett said Monday that email expressed his frustration at having assured top-performing schools like DeHaan’s would be recognized in the grading system, but coming away with a flawed formula that would undo his promises.
When requested a status update Sept. 14, his staff alerted him that the new school grade, a 3.50, was painfully close to an “A.” Then-deputy chief of staff Marcie Brown wrote that the state might not be able to “legally” change the cutoff for an “A.”
“We can revise the rule,” Bennett responded.
Over the next week, his top staff worked arduously on the problem and by Sept. 21, Christel House had jumped to a 3.75.
When the new grades were released statewide on Oct. 31, grade changes were vastly different from the February simulation, with schools seeing much milder swings in their results. The worst grades were a bit more common, with F’s rising by just two percentage points to 7 percent. A’s dropped just 6.5 percentage points to 41 percent of all schools.
One of those A’s was Christel House.